MedicateOH Writers’ Workshop graduate Ra’Nesha delves into the struggles faced by Ohio’s medical marijuana brands as professionals navigate the complexities of cannabis content censorship. From the impact on audience connection to the specific challenges of compliance with the state’s restrictive laws, Ra’Nesha explores the landscape of cannabis content censorship and its implications for the Ohio cannabis community.

Social Media and Cannabis Content Restrictions
In today’s digital age, social media platforms play a pivotal role in communication, brand building, and community engagement. However, for the vibrant and ever-growing cannabis industry, these platforms present unique challenges due to the restrictions and limitations imposed on cannabis-related content. In this article, we delve into the struggles faced by Ohio’s cannabis brands and professionals as they navigate the complexities of social media censorship.
From the impact on audience connection to the specific challenges of compliance with Ohio’s restrictive laws, let’s explore the landscape of cannabis content censorship and its implications for the Ohio cannabis community.

The Impact on Audience Connection: Linked In Polls
Social media platforms have revolutionized the way businesses connect with their target audience. However, for cannabis brands and professionals, the ability to forge meaningful connections is hindered by the censorship of cannabis-related content.
The results of our recent LinkedIn polls shed light on this issue. Poll 1, with participation from professionals across various regions, revealed that 68% have faced cannabis-related content censorship, where posts were flagged or removed. Poll 2, exclusively focused on Ohio’s cannabis community, showed that a staggering 92% experienced such censorship. These statistics underscore the urgent need to address this stifling trend.
The results of our recent LinkedIn polls shed light on this issue. Poll 1, with participation from professionals across various regions, revealed that 68% have faced cannabis-related content censorship, where posts were flagged or removed. Poll 2, exclusively focused on Ohio’s cannabis community, showed that a staggering 92% experienced such censorship. These statistics underscore the urgent need to address this stifling trend.
-LinkedIn Poll
Navigating Compliance with Ohio’s Restrictive Laws
Ohio’s cannabis industry operates under specific regulatory frameworks, adding another layer of complexity to social media censorship challenges. Compliance with Ohio’s restrictive laws, while also adhering to the guidelines of major platforms, becomes a delicate balance. Cannabis brands and professionals in Ohio must navigate through stringent regulations governing the advertising and promotion of cannabis products.
One key regulation that Ohio cannabis brands and professionals must adhere to is the prohibition of advertising cannabis products to minors. The state has implemented strict guidelines to prevent the exposure of underage individuals to cannabis-related content. This means that Ohio cannabis brands need to be cautious when creating and sharing content on social media platforms to ensure it does not appeal to or target individuals under the legal age.

Restrictions on Packaging and Labeling
Furthermore, Ohio has specific requirements for the packaging and labeling of cannabis products. Brands must ensure that their product packaging complies with Ohio’s regulations, including the use of standardized warning labels, dosage information, and identification of the licensed producer. These requirements extend to any visual content shared on social media platforms, where brands must ensure that their visuals align with the approved packaging and labeling guidelines.
Another important aspect of compliance in Ohio is the restriction on making false or misleading claims about cannabis products. Brands and professionals must avoid making unsubstantiated claims about the benefits or effects of cannabis products, as it violates both state and federal regulations. This includes refraining from making medical claims without proper substantiation and adhering to the guidelines set forth by regulatory bodies.
Additionally, Ohio imposes restrictions on advertising in certain locations or contexts. Cannabis brands and professionals must be mindful of where and how they advertise their products on social media platforms. They need to ensure that their content does not appear in locations or contexts that are prohibited by Ohio law, such as schools, public transportation, or areas where minors are present.

Inconsistencies in Enforcement and the Path Forward
The inconsistencies in enforcing guidelines and policies further exacerbate the challenges faced by cannabis brands and professionals. Social media platforms approach cannabis content with biases and preconceptions rooted in the historical stigma surrounding the plant. This biased approach leads to stricter scrutiny and limitations, hindering the industry’s ability to normalize and educate the public about cannabis use. By embracing education, destigmatization, and responsible communication, these platforms can create a space where cannabis brands and professionals can thrive and engage with their audience more effectively.
As the cannabis industry continues to grow and evolve, so do the challenges associated with social media censorship. Ohio’s cannabis community faces unique obstacles as they navigate the restrictions imposed by major platforms and comply with the state’s specific regulations.

Recent Legislation
Ohio legislators have addressed content restrictions in Senate Bill 9 to improve the medical marijuana program and in House Bill 168 to enact adult use. The Coalition to Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol also addresses advertising restrictions in its ballot measure effort to legalize.
While neither bill nor the ballot measure has yet to become law, the state operating budget signed into law on July 4 included language to establish the Division of Marijuana Control within the Ohio Department of Commerce, essentially eliminating the Board of Pharmacy from the program’s purview. These changes could significantly impact the way cannabis companies in Ohio may be allowed to advertise and promote their content online in the future.
By shedding light on the impact of cannabis content censorship, understanding the guidelines and inconsistencies, and embracing responsible engagement, Ohio’s cannabis brands and professionals can work towards a future where their voices are heard and their stories are shared freely.
####
Read more of this series at https://emeraldreverie.wordpress.com/